Zum Inhalt springen

MCP Server / oraclaw

oraclaw

Deterministic decision-intelligence MCP server for AI agents — 17 tools, 21 algorithms (LinUCB, HiGHS LP/MIP, PageRank, Monte Carlo, CMA-ES, conformal). Sub-25ms. Zero LLM cost. AAA on Glama. Field-validated in 12+ OSS projects.

8von @WhatsonyourmindMITGitHub →

Installation

Claude Code
claude mcp add oraclaw -- npx -y @oraclaw/bandit
npx
npx -y @oraclaw/bandit

npm: @oraclaw/bandit

Transport

stdio

Tools (20)

optimize_bandit

UCB1 / Thompson / Epsilon-Greedy arm selection

optimize_contextual

Context-aware LinUCB bandit

optimize_evolve

Genetic algorithm for discrete + multi-objective problems

solve_schedule

Energy-matched task scheduling

score_convergence

Multi-source probability consensus (Hellinger)

score_calibration

Brier + log score for forecaster accuracy

predict_bayesian

Beta posterior update from weighted evidence

predict_ensemble

Multi-model consensus + uncertainty decomposition

plan_pathfind

A* + Yen's k-shortest paths

simulate_montecarlo

Single-factor Monte Carlo (6 distributions)

simulate_scenario

What-if comparison + sensitivity ranking

optimize_cmaes

CMA-ES continuous black-box optimization

solve_constraints

LP / MIP / QP solver via HiGHS (provably optimal)

analyze_graph

PageRank, Louvain communities, bottleneck detection

analyze_risk

VaR and CVaR (Expected Shortfall)

predict_forecast

ARIMA + Holt-Winters time series forecasting

detect_anomaly

Z-Score + IQR anomaly detection

Tier

Calls

Auth

None

Dokumentation

OraClaw

MCP Optimization Tools for AI Agents -- 17 tools, 21 algorithms, sub-25ms. Zero LLM cost.

Your AI agent can't do math. OraClaw gives it deterministic optimization, simulation, forecasting, and risk analysis through the Model Context Protocol. Every tool returns structured JSON, runs in under 25ms, and costs nothing to compute.


Validation

OraClaw's math has been independently implemented in 12 open-source projects across AI agent orchestration, time-series tracking, vector search, MIP optimization, and production ML systems -- all within the first 8 days after public launch.

Selected field implementations (see CHANGELOG.md for the full list):

  • chernistry/bernstein -- 84⭐ agent orchestration framework. LinUCB contextual router with α=0.3, shadow-evaluation path, interpretable decision reasons. Shipped in codex/issue-367-linucb-router 1h40m after the spec correction.
  • stxkxs/nanohype -- contextual bandit routing, pluggable strategy registry (hash / sliding-TTL / semantic), cost anomaly detection, LinUCB on roadmap. "Your input shaped a lot of what actually shipped."
  • rfivesix/hypertrack -- Bayesian/Kalman-style adaptive calorie estimator with phase-aware kcal/kg ramp. Shipped in 0.8.0-beta. "At this point I think the mathematical model is in a very strong place."
  • AlanHuang99/pyrollmatch -- entropy balancing (Hainmueller 2012) with moment constraints + max_weight cap. Shipped in v0.1.3.
  • stffns/vstash -- IDF-sigmoid relevance weighting. Shipped in v0.17.0.

Marketplace distribution:

Maintainer relationships (warm technical correspondence): Qdrant, Milvus, NetworkX, Apache DataFusion, DuckDB, pymc-labs.


Quick Start

1. MCP Server (recommended for AI agents)

Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "oraclaw": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@oraclaw/mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}

Then ask your agent:

"I have 3 email subject line variants. Which should I send next?"

The agent calls optimize_bandit and gets a statistically optimal selection in 0.01ms.

2. REST API (no install)

curl -X POST https://oraclaw-api.onrender.com/api/v1/optimize/bandit \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "arms": [
      {"id": "A", "name": "Option A", "pulls": 10, "totalReward": 7},
      {"id": "B", "name": "Option B", "pulls": 10, "totalReward": 5},
      {"id": "C", "name": "Option C", "pulls": 2, "totalReward": 1.8}
    ],
    "algorithm": "ucb1"
  }'

Response (<1ms):

{
  "selected": { "id": "C", "name": "Option C" },
  "score": 1.876,
  "algorithm": "ucb1",
  "exploitation": 0.9,
  "exploration": 0.976,
  "regret": 0.1
}

Free tier: 25 calls/day, no API key needed.

3. npm SDK

npm install @oraclaw/bandit
import { OraBandit } from '@oraclaw/bandit';

const client = new OraBandit({ baseUrl: 'https://oraclaw-api.onrender.com' });
const result = await client.optimize({
  arms: [
    { id: 'A', name: 'Short Subject', pulls: 500, totalReward: 175 },
    { id: 'B', name: 'Long Subject', pulls: 300, totalReward: 126 },
  ],
  algorithm: 'ucb1',
});

14 SDK packages: @oraclaw/bandit, @oraclaw/solver, @oraclaw/simulate, @oraclaw/risk, @oraclaw/forecast, @oraclaw/anomaly, @oraclaw/graph, @oraclaw/bayesian, @oraclaw/ensemble, @oraclaw/calibrate, @oraclaw/evolve, @oraclaw/pathfind, @oraclaw/cmaes, @oraclaw/decide


Why?

LLMs generate plausible text, not optimal solutions. Ask GPT to pick the best A/B test variant and it applies a heuristic that ignores the exploration-exploitation tradeoff. Ask it to solve a linear program and it hallucinates constraints. OraClaw gives your agent access to real algorithms -- bandits, solvers, forecasters, risk models -- that return mathematically correct answers in sub-millisecond time, without burning tokens on reasoning.


MCP Tool Catalog (17 tools)

Free tier (11 tools, no API key — 25 calls/day per IP):

| Tool | What It Does | Latency | |------|-------------|---------| | optimize_bandit | UCB1 / Thompson / Epsilon-Greedy arm selection | 0.01ms | | optimize_contextual | Context-aware LinUCB bandit | 0.05ms | | optimize_evolve | Genetic algorithm for discrete + multi-objective problems | <10ms | | solve_schedule | Energy-matched task scheduling | 3ms | | score_convergence | Multi-source probability consensus (Hellinger) | 0.04ms | | score_calibration | Brier + log score for forecaster accuracy | 0.02ms | | predict_bayesian | Beta posterior update from weighted evidence | 0.05ms | | predict_ensemble | Multi-model consensus + uncertainty decomposition | 0.1ms | | plan_pathfind | A* + Yen's k-shortest paths | 0.1ms | | simulate_montecarlo | Single-factor Monte Carlo (6 distributions) | <2ms | | simulate_scenario | What-if comparison + sensitivity ranking | <5ms |

Premium tier (6 tools, requires ORACLAW_API_KEY):

| Tool | What It Does | Latency | |------|-------------|---------| | optimize_cmaes | CMA-ES continuous black-box optimization | 12ms | | solve_constraints | LP / MIP / QP solver via HiGHS (provably optimal) | 2ms | | analyze_graph | PageRank, Louvain communities, bottleneck detection | 0.5ms | | analyze_risk | VaR and CVaR (Expected Shortfall) | <2ms | | predict_forecast | ARIMA + Holt-Winters time series forecasting | 0.08ms | | detect_anomaly | Z-Score + IQR anomaly detection | 0.01ms |

14 of 18 REST endpoints respond in under 1ms. All under 25ms.


Try It Now

The API is live. No signup required.

# Bayesian inference
curl -X POST https://oraclaw-api.onrender.com/api/v1/predict/bayesian \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prior": 0.3, "evidence": [{"factor": "positive_test", "weight": 0.9, "value": 0.05}]}'

# Monte Carlo simulation
curl -X POST https://oraclaw-api.onrender.com/api/v1/simulate/montecarlo \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"simulations": 1000, "distribution": "normal", "params": {"mean": 100, "stddev": 15}}'

# Anomaly detection
curl -X POST https://oraclaw-api.onrender.com/api/v1/detect/anomaly \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"data": [10, 12, 11, 13, 50, 12, 11, 10], "method": "zscore", "threshold": 2.0}'

Pricing

| Tier | Calls | Price | Auth | |------|-------|-------|------| | Free | 25/day | $0 | None | | Pay-per-call | 1K/day | $0.005/call | API key | | Starter | 10K/mo | $9/mo | API key | | Growth | 100K/mo | $49/mo | API key | | Scale | 1M/mo | $199/mo | API key |

x402 USDC: AI agents pay $0.01-$0.15 per call with USDC on Base. No subscription, no API key.


Source Code

| Component | Path | |-----------|------| | MCP Server | mission-control/packages/mcp-server/ | | REST API | mission-control/apps/api/ | | Algorithms | mission-control/apps/api/src/services/oracle/algorithms/ | | SDK Packages | mission-control/packages/sdk/ | | LangChain Tools | mission-control/integrations/langchain/oraclaw_tools.py | | Mobile App | mission-control/apps/mobile/ | | Dashboard (Next.js) | web/ |


Building with OraClaw?

We'd love to hear what you're working on. Share your use case, ask questions, or request features:


Links

  • Live API: https://oraclaw-api.onrender.com
  • Dashboard: https://web-olive-one-89.vercel.app
  • npm: https://www.npmjs.com/org/oraclaw
  • Demo: https://web-olive-one-89.vercel.app/demo
  • GitHub: https://github.com/Whatsonyourmind/oracle

If this saved your agent from hallucinating math, star us :star:

License

MIT